Quincy IL News
Thursday, July 29, 2010   |   Updated 5 hours ago
 
RSS FeedJRG Blog
QuincyNews.org Photo
Commenter claims inconsistencies in downtown planning

Posted on Wednesday, March 3, 2010 by J. Robert Gough       Email This Story E-mail This Story

Your E-mail Address:
Your Friend's E-mail Address:
You may enter up to five addresses seperated by commas (,).
Message:
300 Character Maximum.

Plucked from a commenter to provoke discussion:

The cities tight restrictions and the way Bevelheimer and Steinkamp treat small business' that aren't box stores, have a lot to do with downtown's current shape.

Drive through other cities and you will notice things that draw attention to business like signs on sidewalks, product on sidewalks, and brightly lit signs. These things aren't allowed in the downtown (city code).

Drive through Quincy's downtown and you can't tell the open stores from the empty buildings. No excitement or shopping atmosphere.

Any store that has attempted to create exitement and a shopping atmosphere can except "gestapo tactics" by Bevelheimer or Steinkamp.

The only excitement that I see downtown is the big light show in front of the "empty" theatre. This sign according to code isn't suppose to be allowed.

The city needs to review its regulations in the downtown. They need to cater to small retail shops or the only thing left downtown will be government and lawyer offices.

So what do YOU think?

JDH
Posts: 1
Comment
These boys
Reply #5 on : Wed March 03, 2010, 19:17:48
don't have the balls to tell the big boxes they can't do business the way they like. The downtown folks should band together and call these clown's bluff. What will they do? Run people off? Good call,Tex! Hope you can take what you dish out.
Storm
Posts: 1
Comment
DOWNTOWN NEEDS KAROL EHMEN
Reply #4 on : Wed March 03, 2010, 16:34:31
Oh, wait...they walked her off for something more...something..... Where are the folks responsible for that today?
Woodville
Posts: 1
Comment
Shopping Downtown Can Be A Challenge
Reply #3 on : Wed March 03, 2010, 16:20:51
When I drive through other cities in the winter time I notice something else. The snow has been removed from the downtown sidewalks, and not just pushed into the street by the curb. This winter has seen many areas of the downtown sidewalks covered with snow and ice. Granted, many stores are empty so there is no one on site to clear the sidewalks, but before sponsoring gimmicky promotions, the HQBD should focus on making it possible to walk downtown with risking life and limb. The last snowfall meant that one had to be an Olympic hurdler to get over the piles of snow at the corners when crossing downtown streets. The city should enforce no parking on the streets downtown at night after a snowfall so plows can remove the snow in the parking lane before freezing into four inches of an icy glaze that makes parking at the curb and getting out of your car difficult if not impossible. This winter I have asked myself "Do I want to risk the conditions downtown, or drive to a big box store where I know getting out of my car and walking into the store will be risk-free?" Perhaps I'll return to the downtown when conditions improve.
fingers
Posts: 1
Comment
Setback
Reply #2 on : Wed March 03, 2010, 11:37:22
That's the problem with zero setback in the downtown area. Anything the store wants to do intrudes on the city right-of-way. So there are safety considerations and pass-thru considerations. It doesn't leave much room for display. And I believe they've mandated zero setback for the new TIF also.
UrKidsWillPay
Posts: 1
Comment
The poster is absolutely right but
Reply #1 on : Wed March 03, 2010, 10:33:45
didn't really make the comparisons eluded to so I will.

The two "gentlemen" mentioned will harrass small business people to no end while at the same time bending over and grabbing the ankles for a big box store. Put something on the sidewalk as a small business and you get a nasty call and yet the big box stores sell of the sidewalks all the time...(I will grant you they are private sidewalks but I'm not sure the ordinance says public anyway.)

There is a code that requires a minimum # of parking spaces and every one of these big boxes comes in and BARELY meets that minimum and then they turn around and take up 1/4 of those spots for a lawn and garden shop that is up for 6,7 months of the year. #1 they are below the minimums when they do this and #2 they are effectively increasing the sq ft of their stores when they do this so they should be required to have an even higher minimum number of spaces.
You must have a QuincyNews.org account to post comments.

Click Here to create your account.

User name:*
Full name:*
Email address:*
Password:*
Confirm password:*
State:
Zip:
 * - Indicates required fields

Already have an account? Click Here to Login.

User:
Password:
Forget Password?